On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:37 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/2/21 1:23 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote: > > Based on for-5.11/io_uring. Actually this was a typo (copy-n-paste error), it was on top of for-5.12/io_uring. Doesn't really matter though. > Can you check if it still applies against for-5.13/io_uring? Both the > vfs and io_uring bits. It does not (the io_uring bits), I'll send v3 soon. -- Dmitry Kadashev
