Hi,
We can meet below deadlock scenario when writing back dirty pages, and
writing files at the same time. The deadlock scenario can be reproduced
by:
- A writeback worker thread A is trying to write a bunch of dirty pages by
fuse_writepages(), and the fuse_writepages() will lock one page (named page 1),
add it into rb_tree with setting writeback flag, and unlock this page 1,
then try to lock next page (named page 2).
- But at the same time a file writing can be triggered by another process B,
to write several pages by fuse_perform_write(), the fuse_perform_write()
will lock all required pages firstly, then wait for all writeback pages
are completed by fuse_wait_on_page_writeback().
- Now the process B can already lock page 1 and page 2, and wait for page 1
waritehack is completed (page 1 is under writeback set by process A). But
process A can not complete the writeback of page 1, since it is still
waiting for locking page 2, which was locked by process B already.
A deadlock is occurred.
To fix this issue, we should make sure each page writeback is completed after
lock the page in fuse_fill_write_pages(), and then write them together when
all pages are stable.
[1450578.772896] INFO: task kworker/u259:6:119885 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[1450578.796179] kworker/u259:6 D 0 119885 2 0x00000028
[1450578.796185] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-0:78)
[1450578.796188] Call trace:
[1450578.798804] __switch_to+0xd8/0x148
[1450578.802458] __schedule+0x280/0x6a0
[1450578.806112] schedule+0x34/0xe8
[1450578.809413] io_schedule+0x20/0x40
[1450578.812977] __lock_page+0x164/0x278
[1450578.816718] write_cache_pages+0x2b0/0x4a8
[1450578.820986] fuse_writepages+0x84/0x100 [fuse]
[1450578.825592] do_writepages+0x58/0x108
[1450578.829412] __writeback_single_inode+0x48/0x448
[1450578.834217] writeback_sb_inodes+0x220/0x520
[1450578.838647] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x50/0xe8
[1450578.843080] wb_writeback+0x294/0x3b8
[1450578.846906] wb_do_writeback+0x2ec/0x388
[1450578.850992] wb_workfn+0x80/0x1e0
[1450578.854472] process_one_work+0x1bc/0x3f0
[1450578.858645] worker_thread+0x164/0x468
[1450578.862559] kthread+0x108/0x138
[1450578.865960] INFO: task doio:207752 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[1450578.888321] doio D 0 207752 207740 0x00000000
[1450578.888329] Call trace:
[1450578.890945] __switch_to+0xd8/0x148
[1450578.894599] __schedule+0x280/0x6a0
[1450578.898255] schedule+0x34/0xe8
[1450578.901568] fuse_wait_on_page_writeback+0x8c/0xc8 [fuse]
[1450578.907128] fuse_perform_write+0x240/0x4e0 [fuse]
[1450578.912082] fuse_file_write_iter+0x1dc/0x290 [fuse]
[1450578.917207] do_iter_readv_writev+0x110/0x188
[1450578.921724] do_iter_write+0x90/0x1c8
[1450578.925598] vfs_writev+0x84/0xf8
[1450578.929071] do_writev+0x70/0x110
[1450578.932552] __arm64_sys_writev+0x24/0x30
[1450578.936727] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x80/0x1f8
[1450578.941694] el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x80
[1450578.945606] el0_svc+0x10/0x14
Suggested-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 8cccecb..af082b6 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1166,6 +1166,8 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_args_pages *ap,
if (!page)
break;
+ wait_on_page_writeback(page);
After talked with Tao, I should use fuse_wait_on_page_writeback()
instead to wait for each page stable in fuse, and also will remove
the fuse_wait_on_page_writeback() in fuse_send_write_pages().
I will send a V2, please ignore this patch. Thanks.
