On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:22:08AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The receive_fd_replace case shares almost no logic with the more general > __receive_fd case, so split it into a separate function. > > BTW, I'm not sure if receive_fd_replace is such a useful primitive to > start with, why not just open code it in seccomp? I tend to agree and argued in a similar fashion back when we added this but we ultimately decided to add it. So now we're back to the original argument. :) Christian
