> > +``miscattr_get`` > > I wish this wasn't named "misc" because miscellaneous is vague. > > fileattr_get, perhaps? > > (FWIW I'm not /that/ passionate about starting a naming bikeshed, feel > free to ignore.) > Eventual bikeshedding is hard to avoid in this case... I don't feel strongly against "misc", but I do think the flags and ioctl are already known as "fsx" so it would be more friendly to go with that. If you don't like "fsxflags" because it's not only flags and you think "fsxattr" is too close to "xattr" (FWIW I don't think it is going to be a source of confusion), we can simply go with get_fsx(), similar to get_acl(). It doesn't matter what name we use as long as everyone is clear on what it is. "struct fsx" is not any more or any less clear than "struct statx" and while "fsx" it is a pretty arbitrary name, it is not much less arbitrary than "miscattr". Thanks, Amir.
