Re: fs: avoid softlockups in s_inodes iterators commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/16/21 3:56 PM, David Mozes wrote:
> Hi,
> Per Eric's request, I forward this discussion to the list first.
> My first answers are inside

ok, but you stripped out all of the other useful information like backtraces,
stack corruption, etc. You need to provide the evidence of the actual failure
for the list to see. Also ..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 10:18 PM
> To: David Mozes <david.mozes@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Mail from David.Mozes regarding fs: avoid softlockups in s_inodes iterators commit
> 
> On 3/16/21 3:02 PM, David Mozes wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>

...

> David > Not sure yet,  Will check.
>> 5.4.8 vanilla kernel it custom
> 
> Is it vanilla, or is it custom? 5.4.8 or 5.4.80?
> 
> David> 5.4.80 small custom as I mantion. 

what is a "small custom?" Can you reproduce it on an unmodified upstream kernel?

-Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux