Re: [PATCH 2/2] zonefs: Fix O_APPEND async write handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/03/16 2:09, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 07:22:56AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2021/03/15 16:21, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>>> On 15/03/2021 08:16, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> 818	static ssize_t zonefs_file_dio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>>>>    819	{
>>>>    820		struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
>>>>    821		struct zonefs_inode_info *zi = ZONEFS_I(inode);
>>>>    822		struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
>>>>    823		bool sync = is_sync_kiocb(iocb);
>>>>    824		bool append = false;
>>>>    825		ssize_t ret, count;
>>>
>>>>    843		count = zonefs_write_checks(iocb, from);
>>>>  > 844		if (count <= 0)
>>>>    845			goto inode_unlock;
>>>
>>> Args that needs to be:
>>> 			if (count <= 0) {
>>> 				ret = count;
>>> 				goto inode_unlock;
>>> 			}
>>>
>>> Sorry for not spotting it.
>>
>> Yep. Sending v2. Weird that gcc does not complain on my local compile...
> 
> Unfortunately, GCC's version of this warning was disabled for default
> compiles by Linus in commit 78a5255ffb6a ("Stop the ad-hoc games with
> -Wno-maybe-initialized"). W=2 is required, which can be quite noisy from
> my understanding. KCFLAGS=-Wmaybe-uninitialized is a good option.

I was not aware of that change. Thanks for the information !


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux