Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Use an xarray instead of inserted bookmarks to scan mount list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:07:39PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Hi Al, Miklós,
> 
> Can we consider replacing the "insert cursor" approach we're currently
> using for proc files to scan the current namespace's mount list[1] with
> something that uses an xarray of mounts indexed by mnt_id?
> 
> This has some advantages:
> 
>  (1) It's simpler.  We don't need to insert dummy mount objects as
>      bookmarks into the mount list and code that's walking the list doesn't
>      have to carefully step over them.
> 
>  (2) We can use the file position to represent the mnt_id and can jump to
>      it directly - ie. using seek() to jump to a mount object by its ID.
> 
>  (3) It might make it easier to use RCU in future to dump mount entries
>      rather than having to take namespace_sem.  xarray provides for the
>      possibility of tagging entries to say that they're viewable to avoid
>      dumping incomplete mount objects.

Usually one fully constructs the object, then inserts it into the XArray.

> But there are a number of disadvantages:
> 
>  (1) We have to allocate memory to maintain the xarray, which becomes more
>      of a problem as mnt_id values get scattered.

mnt_id values don't seem to get particularly scattered.  They're allocated
using an IDA, so they stay small (unlike someone using idr_alloc_cyclic
;-).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux