On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:32:20PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > The standard, usual, expected way of modifying a filesystem's behaviour > is via mount options. This is also quite flexible. > > Is there some extraordinary reason why the standard interface is not to > be used here? Because it would have to be managed (and consulted) per ... what? vfsmount? superblock? This is featuritis gone MAD. I'll take my bikeshed in teal, stippled with cornsilk. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
