On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:40:55AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:18:09AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > The time between atime updates can be configured at boot > > > with the relatime_interval kernel argument, or at runtime through a sysctl. > > > > Shouldn't it be a per-mount value, with defaults coming from the sysctl? > > Perhaps a more sensible question would be "Why make it configurable at > all?" What's wrong with hardcoding 24 hours? Or, to put it another > way, who wants to change it from 24 hours, and why? There's approximately no cost to it, and arguably use cases that would benefit. I don't think they'd be common enough to benefit from the additional complexity of making it per-mount. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
