Re: [PATCH v3] flock.2: add CIFS details

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It looks great, and sorry to be a pest, but I just noticed - it's
EACCES (not EACCESS).

Reviewed-By: Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 3/3/2021 2:03 PM, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
From: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@xxxxxxxx>

Similarly to NFS, CIFS flock() locks behave differently than the
standard. Document those differences.

Here is the rendered text:

CIFS details
   In  Linux kernels up to 5.4, flock() is not propagated over SMB. A file
   with such locks will not appear locked for remote clients.

   Since Linux 5.5, flock() locks are emulated with SMB  byte-range  locks
   on  the  entire  file.  Similarly  to NFS, this means that fcntl(2) and
   flock() locks interact with one another. Another important  side-effect
   is  that  the  locks are not advisory anymore: a write on a locked file
   will always fail with EACCESS.  This difference originates from the de-
   sign of locks in the SMB protocol, which provides mandatory locking se-
   mantics. The nobrl mount option (see mount.cifs(8)) turns off  fnctl(2)
   and  flock() lock propagation to remote clients and makes flock() locks
   advisory again.

Signed-off-by: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@xxxxxxxx>
---
  man2/flock.2 | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/man2/flock.2 b/man2/flock.2
index 61d4b5396..4b6e5cc24 100644
--- a/man2/flock.2
+++ b/man2/flock.2
@@ -239,6 +239,35 @@ see the discussion of the
  .I "local_lock"
  option in
  .BR nfs (5).
+.SS CIFS details
+In Linux kernels up to 5.4,
+.BR flock ()
+is not propagated over SMB. A file with such locks will not appear
+locked for remote clients.
+.PP
+Since Linux 5.5,
+.BR flock ()
+locks are emulated with SMB byte-range locks on the entire
+file. Similarly to NFS, this means that
+.BR fcntl (2)
+and
+.BR flock ()
+locks interact with one another. Another important side-effect is that
+the locks are not advisory anymore: a write on a locked file will
+always fail with
+.BR EACCESS .

EACCES

+This difference originates from the design of locks in the SMB
+protocol, which provides mandatory locking semantics. The
+.I nobrl
+mount option (see
+.BR mount.cifs (8))
+turns off
+.BR fnctl (2)
+and
+.BR flock ()
+lock propagation to remote clients and makes
+.BR flock ()
+locks advisory again.
  .SH SEE ALSO
  .BR flock (1),
  .BR close (2),




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux