Re: [PATCH 5/7] fanotify: limit number of event merge attempts

[Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 6:20 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Event merges are expensive when event queue size is large.
> Limit the linear search to 128 merge tests.
> In combination with 128 hash lists, there is a potential to
> merge with up to 16K events in the hashed queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> index 12df6957e4d8..6d3807012851 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,15 @@ static bool fanotify_should_merge(struct fsnotify_event *old_fsn,
>         return false;
>  }
>
> +/* Limit event merges to limit CPU overhead per event */
> +#define FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_EVENTS 128
> +
>  /* and the list better be locked by something too! */
>  static int fanotify_merge(struct list_head *list, struct fsnotify_event *event)
>  {
>         struct fsnotify_event *test_event;
>         struct fanotify_event *new;
> +       int i = 0;
>
>         pr_debug("%s: list=%p event=%p\n", __func__, list, event);
>         new = FANOTIFY_E(event);
> @@ -147,6 +151,8 @@ static int fanotify_merge(struct list_head *list, struct fsnotify_event *event)
>                 return 0;
>
>         list_for_each_entry_reverse(test_event, list, list) {
> +               if (++i > FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_EVENTS)
> +                       break;
>                 if (fanotify_should_merge(test_event, event)) {
>                         FANOTIFY_E(test_event)->mask |= new->mask;
>                         return 1;
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Jan,

I was thinking that this patch or a variant thereof should be applied to stable
kernels, but not the entire series.

OTOH, I am concerned about regressing existing workloads that depend on
merging events on more than 128 inodes.
I thought of this compromise between performance and functional regressions:

/*
 * Limit event merges to limit CPU overhead per new event.
 * For legacy mode, avoid unlimited CPU overhead, but do not regress the event
 * merge ratio in heavy concurrent workloads with default queue size.
 * For new FAN_REPORT_FID modes, make sure that CPU overhead is low.
 */
#define FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_OLD_EVENTS   16384
#define FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_FID_EVENTS   128

static inline int fanotify_max_merge_events(struct fsnotify_group *group)
{
        if (FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FANOTIFY_FID_BITS))
                return FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_FID_EVENTS;
        else
                return FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_OLD_EVENTS;
}

I can start the series with this patch and change that to:

#define FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_FID_EVENTS   128

static inline int fanotify_max_merge_events(struct fsnotify_group *group)
{
               return FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_EVENTS;
}

At the end of the series.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Amir.