Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: fsx-linux failing with latest cifs-2.6 git tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Do you know why someone added the AOP_FLAG_UNITERRUPTIBLE check in
cifs_write_begin instead of always marking a page up to date if we are
writing the whole page?  How often would that flag be set - I only see
it in the path which calls generic_file_buffered_write

 	/* If we are writing a full page it will be up to date,
 	   no need to read from the server */
 	if (len == PAGE_CACHE_SIZE && flags & AOP_FLAG_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)

It seems restrictive
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:32:05 -0600
> "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Looks fine to me, you can add in the acked-by ... if Dave or Nick
>> agree and it tests out ok then I will push to cifs-2.6.git within next
>> day or so.
>>
>
> Testing seems fine with this patch. Connectathon suite still passes,
> and fsx and fsstress both ran overnight without errors.
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux