Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:48:17PM -0800, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index f94a35296618..79e1f0155afa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -135,11 +135,14 @@ void hugetlb_show_meminfo(void);
>  unsigned long hugetlb_total_pages(void);
>  vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			unsigned long address, unsigned int flags);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD

I'm confused why this is needed.. hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() should only be
called in userfaultfd.c, but if without uffd config set it won't compile
either:

        obj-$(CONFIG_USERFAULTFD) += userfaultfd.o

>  int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, pte_t *dst_pte,
>  				struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
>  				unsigned long dst_addr,
>  				unsigned long src_addr,
> +				enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
>  				struct page **pagep);
> +#endif
>  int hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long from, long to,
>  						struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  						vm_flags_t vm_flags);
> diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> index fb9abaeb4194..2fcb686211e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> +++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,22 @@ extern int sysctl_unprivileged_userfaultfd;
>  
>  extern vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason);
>  
> +/*
> + * The mode of operation for __mcopy_atomic and its helpers.
> + *
> + * This is almost an implementation detail (mcopy_atomic below doesn't take this
> + * as a parameter), but it's exposed here because memory-kind-specific
> + * implementations (e.g. hugetlbfs) need to know the mode of operation.
> + */
> +enum mcopy_atomic_mode {
> +	/* A normal copy_from_user into the destination range. */
> +	MCOPY_ATOMIC_NORMAL,
> +	/* Don't copy; map the destination range to the zero page. */
> +	MCOPY_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE,
> +	/* Just setup the dst_vma, without modifying the underlying page(s). */
> +	MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE,
> +};
> +

Maybe better to keep this to where it's used, e.g. hugetlb.h where we've
defined hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte()?

[...]

> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 6f9d8349f818..3d318ef3d180 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4647,6 +4647,7 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD

So I feel like you added the header ifdef for this.

IMHO we can drop both since that's what we have had.  I agree maybe it's better
to not compile that without CONFIG_USERFAULTFD but that may worth a standalone
patch anyways.

>  /*
>   * Used by userfaultfd UFFDIO_COPY.  Based on mcopy_atomic_pte with
>   * modifications for huge pages.
> @@ -4656,6 +4657,7 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>  			    struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
>  			    unsigned long dst_addr,
>  			    unsigned long src_addr,
> +			    enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
>  			    struct page **pagep)
>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping;
> @@ -4668,7 +4670,10 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>  	int ret;
>  	struct page *page;
>  
> -	if (!*pagep) {
> +	mapping = dst_vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> +	idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, dst_vma, dst_addr);
> +
> +	if (!*pagep && mode != MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		page = alloc_huge_page(dst_vma, dst_addr, 0);
>  		if (IS_ERR(page))
> @@ -4685,6 +4690,12 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>  			/* don't free the page */
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> +	} else if (mode == MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE) {
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +		page = find_lock_page(mapping, idx);
> +		*pagep = NULL;
> +		if (!page)
> +			goto out;
>  	} else {
>  		page = *pagep;
>  		*pagep = NULL;

I would write this as:

    if (mode == MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE)
        ...
    else if (!*pagep)
        ...
    else 
        ...

No strong opinion, but that'll look slightly cleaner to me.

[...]

> @@ -408,7 +407,7 @@ extern ssize_t __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>  				      unsigned long dst_start,
>  				      unsigned long src_start,
>  				      unsigned long len,
> -				      bool zeropage);
> +				      enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
>  
>  static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
> @@ -417,7 +416,7 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>  						unsigned long dst_addr,
>  						unsigned long src_addr,
>  						struct page **page,
> -						bool zeropage,
> +						enum mcopy_atomic_mode mode,
>  						bool wp_copy)
>  {
>  	ssize_t err;
> @@ -433,22 +432,38 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>  	 * and not in the radix tree.
>  	 */
>  	if (!(dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> -		if (!zeropage)
> +		switch (mode) {
> +		case MCOPY_ATOMIC_NORMAL:
>  			err = mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_vma,
>  					       dst_addr, src_addr, page,
>  					       wp_copy);
> -		else
> +			break;
> +		case MCOPY_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE:
>  			err = mfill_zeropage_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
>  						 dst_vma, dst_addr);
> +			break;
> +		/* It only makes sense to CONTINUE for shared memory. */
> +		case MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE:
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(wp_copy);
> -		if (!zeropage)
> +		switch (mode) {
> +		case MCOPY_ATOMIC_NORMAL:
>  			err = shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
>  						     dst_vma, dst_addr,
>  						     src_addr, page);
> -		else
> +			break;
> +		case MCOPY_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE:
>  			err = shmem_mfill_zeropage_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd,
>  						       dst_vma, dst_addr);
> +			break;
> +		case MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE:
> +			/* FIXME: Add minor fault interception for shmem. */
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return err;

The whole chunk above is not needed for hugetlbfs it seems - I'd avoid touching
the anon/shmem code path until it's being supported.

What you need is probably set zeropage as below in __mcopy_atomic():

    zeropage = (mode == MCOPY_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE);

Before passing it over to mfill_atomic_pte().  As long as we reject
UFFDIO_CONTINUE with !hugetlbfs correctly that'll be enough iiuc.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux