Re: [PATCH v15 03/11] riscv/Kconfig: make direct map manipulation options depend on MMU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 03:00:41 PST (-0800), rppt@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:12:30PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:06:04 PST (-0800), rppt@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP and ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY configuration options have
> no meaning when CONFIG_MMU is disabled and there is no point to enable them
> for the nommu case.
>
> Add an explicit dependency on MMU for these options.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index d82303dcc6b6..d35ce19ab1fa 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ config RISCV
>  	select ARCH_HAS_KCOV
>  	select ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB
>  	select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
> -	select ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
> -	select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
> +	select ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP if MMU
> +	select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY if MMU
>  	select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if MMU
>  	select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>  	select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT

Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx>

LMK if you want this to go in via the RISC-V tree, otherwise I'm going to
assume it's going in along with the rest of these.  FWIW I see these in other
architectures without the MMU guard.

Except arm, they all always have MMU=y and arm selects only
ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY and has empty stubs for those when MMU=n.

OK, maybe I just checked ARM, then.  I was just making sure.

Indeed I might have been over zealous adding ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY dependency
on MMU, as riscv also has these stubs, but I thought that making this
explicit is a nice thing.

It seems reasonable to me.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux