J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, I'm still confused: there must be some case where we know fscache > > > actually works reliably and doesn't corrupt your data, right? > > > > Using ext2/3, for example. I don't know under what circumstances xfs, ext4 > > and btrfs might insert/remove blocks of zeros, but I'm told it can happen. > > Do ext2/3 work well for fscache in other ways? Ext3 shouldn't be a problem. That's what I used when developing it. I'm not sure if ext2 supports xattrs, though. David
