On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 13:02, Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The current default value for max_user_watches is the 1/16 (6.25%) of > the available low memory, divided for the "watch" cost in bytes. > > Tools like inotify-tools and visual studio code, seem to hit these > limits a little to easy. > > Also amending the documentation, it referred to an old value for this. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst | 4 ++-- > fs/eventpoll.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst > index f48277a0a850..f7fe45e69c41 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst > @@ -380,5 +380,5 @@ This configuration option sets the maximum number of "watches" that are > allowed for each user. > Each "watch" costs roughly 90 bytes on a 32bit kernel, and roughly 160 bytes > on a 64bit one. > -The current default value for max_user_watches is the 1/32 of the available > -low memory, divided for the "watch" cost in bytes. > +The current default value for max_user_watches is the 1/16 (6.25%) of the > +available low memory, divided for the "watch" cost in bytes. > diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c > index a829af074eb5..de9ef8f6d0b2 100644 > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c > @@ -2352,9 +2352,9 @@ static int __init eventpoll_init(void) > > si_meminfo(&si); > /* > - * Allows top 4% of lomem to be allocated for epoll watches (per user). > + * Allows top 6.25% of lomem to be allocated for epoll watches (per user). > */ > - max_user_watches = (((si.totalram - si.totalhigh) / 25) << PAGE_SHIFT) / > + max_user_watches = (((si.totalram - si.totalhigh) / 16) << PAGE_SHIFT) / > EP_ITEM_COST; > BUG_ON(max_user_watches < 0); > > -- > 2.25.1 > Please ignore this, this is the wrong limit (an epoll one), I sent another patch just to update the documentation to be correct. Weiman Long already kindly solved the issue in 92890123749bafc317bbfacbe0a62ce08d78efb7 Separate patch is titled "[PATCH] Update Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst"