Re: [RFC v3 03/11] vdpa: Remove the restriction that only supports virtio-net devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:46:38AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2021/1/19 下午12:59, Xie Yongji wrote:
With VDUSE, we should be able to support all kinds of virtio devices.

Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 29 +++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index 29ed4173f04e..448be7875b6d 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/nospec.h>
 #include <linux/vhost.h>
 #include <linux/virtio_net.h>
+#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
 #include "vhost.h"
@@ -185,26 +186,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
 	return 0;
 }
-static int vhost_vdpa_config_validate(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
-				      struct vhost_vdpa_config *c)
-{
-	long size = 0;
-
-	switch (v->virtio_id) {
-	case VIRTIO_ID_NET:
-		size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config);
-		break;
-	}
-
-	if (c->len == 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (c->len > size - c->off)
-		return -E2BIG;
-
-	return 0;
-}


I think we should use a separate patch for this.

For the vdpa-blk simulator I had the same issues and I'm adding a .get_config_size() callback to vdpa devices.

Do you think make sense or is better to remove this check in vhost/vdpa, delegating the boundaries checks to get_config/set_config callbacks.

Thanks,
Stefano




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux