On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:07:46PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Finally, I'm not convinced that this patch works correctly. We have > in_compat_syscall(), and code that uses it may well be reachable from > ioctl. ioctls are the prime user of in_compat_syscall(). > I personally would like to see in_compat_syscall() go away, > but some other people (Hi, Christoph!) disagree, and usage seems to be > increasing, not decreasing. I'm absolutely against it going away. in_compat_syscall helped to remove so much crap compared to the explicit compat syscalls.
