On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:49:01PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> @@ -296,12 +383,22 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device)
>
> device->zone_info = zone_info;
>
> - /* device->fs_info is not safe to use for printing messages */
> - btrfs_info_in_rcu(NULL,
NULL instead of fs_info
> - "host-%s zoned block device %s, %u zones of %llu bytes",
> - bdev_zoned_model(bdev) == BLK_ZONED_HM ? "managed" : "aware",
> - rcu_str_deref(device->name), zone_info->nr_zones,
> - zone_info->zone_size);
> + if (bdev_zoned_model(bdev) == BLK_ZONED_HM) {
> + model = "host-managed zoned";
> + emulated = "";
> + } else if (bdev_zoned_model(bdev) == BLK_ZONED_HA) {
> + model = "host-aware zoned";
> + emulated = "";
> + } else if (bdev_zoned_model(bdev) == BLK_ZONED_NONE &&
> + device->force_zoned) {
> + model = "regular";
> + emulated = "emulated ";
> + }
> +
> + btrfs_info_in_rcu(device->fs_info,
so what changed that it's fine to use device->fs_info now while it was
not before?
> + "%s block device %s, %u %szones of %llu bytes",
> + model, rcu_str_deref(device->name), zone_info->nr_zones,
> + emulated, zone_info->zone_size);
>
> return 0;
