On Fri 08-01-21 23:58:59, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> wbc->for_sync implies wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL, so there's no need
> to check for both. Just check for WB_SYNC_ALL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 80ee9816d9df5..cee1df6e3bd43 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> * change I_DIRTY_TIME into I_DIRTY_SYNC.
> */
> if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) &&
> - (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->for_sync ||
> + (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL ||
> time_after(jiffies, inode->dirtied_time_when +
> dirtytime_expire_interval * HZ))) {
> trace_writeback_lazytime(inode);
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
