On Mon, Nov 10 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:59:49AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Storage devices are complex enough that they _already_ exhibit behaviour > > which is fairly much non-deterministic in a number of ways. Especially > > if we're talking about SSDs or large arrays, rather than just disks. > > If anything, SSDs are more deterministic than rotating storage. > Variable numbers of sectors per track, unpredictable sector remapping, > track re-reads due to errors during reads ... SSDs seem like a real > improvement. This was also discussed at LPC, and I would tend to disagree. On rotation storage, slight skews here and there are seen, but rarely anything major. On SSD's, when the GC kicks in it can be fairly detrimental to performance. And one run doesn't necessarily compare to the next run, even if you start with the same seed. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
