RE: thin provisioned LUN support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Ted> I thought ATA didn't have any TRIM alignment requirements, and
> > Ted> it's T10 that wants to add it to the SCSI side?
> >
> > The current UNMAP proposal in SCSI doesn't have requirements either.
> 
> I think that is being actively debated & due to go out in the next 
> update. Not sure that it will matter much since vendors will not have 
> implemented it yet in their boxes (at least, not yet)....

Not exactly.  The UNMAP proposal will have no alignment requirements
but will also make it up to the device (array) to decide what to unmap.

I expect implementations to pick out the chunks that can be unmapped
from the ranges that are passed in, and ignore the partial chunks.
As noted in a previous message, the chunk size will be reported in a
VPD page.

Thanks,
--David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux