Re: thin provisioned LUN support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:19:13PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Let's be just a *little* bit fair here.  Suppose we wanted to
> implement thin-provisioned disks using devicemapper and LVM; consider
> that LVM uses a default PE size of 4M for some very good reasons.
> Asking filesystems to be a little smarter about allocation policies so
> that we allocate in existing 4M chunks before going onto the next, and
> asking the block layer to pool trim requests to 4M chunks is not
> totally unreasonable.
> 
> Array vendors use chunk sizes > than typical filesystem chunk sizes
> for the same reason that LVM does.  So to say that this is due to
> purely a "broken firmware architecture" is a little unfair.

I think we would have a full-throated discussion about whether the
right thing to do was to put the tracking in the block layer or in LVM.
Rather similar to what we're doing now, in fact.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux