On 12/17/20 9:19 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > Most callers check for non-zero return, and assume it's -ECHILD (which > it always will be). One caller uses the actual error return. Clean this > up and make it fully consistent, by having unlazy_walk() return a bool > instead. Rename it to try_to_unlazy() and return true on success, and > failure on error. That's easier to read. Al, were you planning on queuing this one up for 5.11 still? I'm fine with holding for 5.12 as well, would just like to know what your plans are. Latter goes for the whole series too, fwiw. -- Jens Axboe
