On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:50:54PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > - ret2 = errseq_check_and_advance(&sb->s_wb_err, &f.file->f_sb_err); > + if (sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance) > + ret2 = sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance(sb, f.file); What a terrible name for an fs operation. You don't seem to be able to distinguish between semantics and implementation. How about check_error()?
