jim owens wrote:
Ric Wheeler wrote:
The type of allocation that would help most is something that tries
to keep the lower block ranges "hot" for allocation, second best
policy would simply keep the allocated blocks in each block group hot
and re-allocate them.
This block reuse policy ignores the issue of wear leveling...
as in most design things, trading one problem for another.
jim
Wear levelling is not a problem for all (most?) T10 unmap capable arrays
since they remap pretty much everything internally,
Ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
