On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:34:10AM -0800, syzbot wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: > Reported-by: syzbot+51ce7a5794c3b12a70d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ============================= > WARNING: suspicious RCU usage > 5.10.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 Not tainted > ----------------------------- > kernel/sched/core.c:7270 Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side critical section! > > other info that might help us debug this: > > > rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 0 > no locks held by udevd/9038. > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 3 PID: 9038 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] > dump_stack+0x107/0x163 lib/dump_stack.c:118 > ___might_sleep+0x220/0x2b0 kernel/sched/core.c:7270 > count.constprop.0+0x164/0x270 fs/exec.c:449 > do_execveat_common+0x2fd/0x7c0 fs/exec.c:1893 > do_execve fs/exec.c:1983 [inline] > __do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:2059 [inline] > __se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:2054 [inline] > __x64_sys_execve+0x8f/0xc0 fs/exec.c:2054 > do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 This must be the victim of something else. There's no way this call trace took the RCU read lock.