On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 12:33:27PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:38:46AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > Yes. And if someone ran sparse over the code both the initial error > > and this varaint would be trivial to spot.. > > > > That's how Aneesh found it. :-) Heh, okay. We really should try to find some annotations that run sparse with endian checking by default for those parts of the tree where it makes sense.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html