Re: "do_copy_range:: Invalid argument"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 02:05:52PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:26:28AM -0500, Mike Marshall wrote:
> > Greetings everyone...
> > 
> > Omnibond has sent me off doing some testing chores lately.
> > I made no Orangefs patches for 5.9 or 5.10 and none were sent,
> > but I thought I should at least run through xfstests.
> > 
> > There are tests that fail on 5.10-rc6 that didn't fail
> > on 5.8-rc7, and I've done enough looking to see that the
> > failure reasons all seem related.
> > 
> > I will, of course, keep looking to try and understand these
> > failures. Bisection might lead me somewhere. In case the
> > notes I've taken so far trigger any of y'all to give me
> > any (constructive :-) ) suggestions, I've included them below.
> > 
> > -Mike
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > generic/075
> >   58rc7: ? (check.log says it ran, results file missing)
> >   510rc6: failed, "do_copy_range:: Invalid argument"
> >           read the tests/generic/075 commit message for "detect
> >           preallocation support for fsx tests"
> > 
> > generic/091
> >   58rc7: passed, but skipped fallocate parts "filesystem does not support"
> >   510rc6: failed, "do_copy_range:: Invalid argument"
> > 
> > generic/112
> >   58rc7: ? (check.log says it ran, results file missing)
> >   510rc6: failed, "do_copy_range:: Invalid argument"
> > 
> > generic/127
> >   58rc7: ? (check.log says it ran, results file missing)
> >   510rc6: failed, "do_copy_range:: Invalid argument"
> > 
> > generic/249
> >   58rc7: passed
> >   510rc6: failed, "sendfile: Invalid argument"
> >           man 2 sendfile -> "SEE ALSO copy_file_range(2)"
> 
> If sendfile() failed, then it's likely a splice related regression,
> not a copy_file_range() problem. The VFS CFR implementation falls
> back to splice if the fs doesn't provide a clone or copy offload
> method.
> 
> THere's only been a handful of changes to fs/splice.c since 5.8rc7,
> so it might be worth doing a quick check reverting them first...

I'd suggest applying the equivalent of
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1606837496-21717-1-git-send-email-asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
would be the first step.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux