[PATCH] bfs: don't use WARNING: string when it's just info.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Make the printk() [bfs "printf" macro] seem less severe by changing
"WARNING:" to "NOTE:".

<asm-generic/bug.h> warns us about using WARNING or BUG in a
format string other than in WARN() or BUG() family macros.
bfs/inode.c is doing just that in a normal printk() call, so
change the "WARNING" string to be "NOTE".

Reported-by: syzbot+3fd34060f26e766536ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Tigran A. Aivazian" <aivazian.tigran@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 fs/bfs/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20201127.orig/fs/bfs/inode.c
+++ linux-next-20201127/fs/bfs/inode.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int bfs_fill_super(struct super_b
 
 	info->si_lasti = (le32_to_cpu(bfs_sb->s_start) - BFS_BSIZE) / sizeof(struct bfs_inode) + BFS_ROOT_INO - 1;
 	if (info->si_lasti == BFS_MAX_LASTI)
-		printf("WARNING: filesystem %s was created with 512 inodes, the real maximum is 511, mounting anyway\n", s->s_id);
+		printf("NOTE: filesystem %s was created with 512 inodes, the real maximum is 511, mounting anyway\n", s->s_id);
 	else if (info->si_lasti > BFS_MAX_LASTI) {
 		printf("Impossible last inode number %lu > %d on %s\n", info->si_lasti, BFS_MAX_LASTI, s->s_id);
 		goto out1;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux