[PATCH 1/9] mm: vmscan: simplify nr_deferred update code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently if (next_deferred - scanned) = 0, the code would just read the current
nr_deferred otherwise add the delta back.  Both needs atomic operation anyway, it
seems there is not too much gain by distinguishing the two cases, so just add the
delta back even though the delta is 0.  This would simply the code for the following
patches too.

Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7b4e31eac2cf..7d6186a07daf 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -528,14 +528,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
 		next_deferred = 0;
 	/*
 	 * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a
-	 * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the
-	 * scan, there is no need to do an update.
+	 * manner that handles concurrent updates.
 	 */
-	if (next_deferred > 0)
-		new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred,
-						&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
-	else
-		new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
+	new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred,
+					&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
 
 	trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
 	return freed;
-- 
2.26.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux