Re: [RFC][PATCH] coredump: Document coredump code exclusively used by cell spufs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> Oleg Nesterov recently asked[1] why is there an unshare_files in
> do_coredump.  After digging through all of the callers of lookup_fd it
> turns out that it is
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c:coredump_next_context
> that needs the unshare_files in do_coredump.
>
> Looking at the history[2] this code was also the only piece of coredump code
> that required the unshare_files when the unshare_files was added.
>
> Looking at that code it turns out that cell is also the only
> architecture that implements elf_coredump_extra_notes_size and
> elf_coredump_extra_notes_write.
>
> I looked at the gdb repo[3] support for cell has been removed[4] in binutils
> 2.34.  Geoff Levand reports he is still getting questions on how to
> run modern kernels on the PS3, from people using 3rd party firmware so
> this code is not dead.  According to Wikipedia the last PS3 shipped in
> Japan sometime in 2017.  So it will probably be a little while before
> everyone's hardware dies.
>
> Add some comments briefly documenting the coredump code that exists
> only to support cell spufs to make it easier to understand the
> coredump code.  Eventually the hardware will be dead, or their won't
> be userspace tools, or the coredump code will be refactored and it
> will be too difficult to update a dead architecture and these comments
> make it easy to tell where to pull to remove cell spufs support.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201123175052.GA20279@xxxxxxxxxx
> [2] 179e037fc137 ("do_coredump(): make sure that descriptor table isn't shared")
> [3] git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
> [4] abf516c6931a ("Remove Cell Broadband Engine debugging support").
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Does this change look good to people?  I think it captures this state of
> things and makes things clearer without breaking anything or removing
> functionality for anyone.

I haven't heard anything except a general ack to the concept of
comments.  So I am applying this.

Eric

>
>  fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 ++
>  fs/coredump.c   | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index b6b3d052ca86..c1996f0aeaed 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -2198,6 +2198,7 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params *cprm)
>  	{
>  		size_t sz = get_note_info_size(&info);
>  
> +		/* For cell spufs */
>  		sz += elf_coredump_extra_notes_size();
>  
>  		phdr4note = kmalloc(sizeof(*phdr4note), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -2261,6 +2262,7 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params *cprm)
>  	if (!write_note_info(&info, cprm))
>  		goto end_coredump;
>  
> +	/* For cell spufs */
>  	if (elf_coredump_extra_notes_write(cprm))
>  		goto end_coredump;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
> index abf807235262..3ff17eea812e 100644
> --- a/fs/coredump.c
> +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> @@ -790,6 +790,7 @@ void do_coredump(const kernel_siginfo_t *siginfo)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* get us an unshared descriptor table; almost always a no-op */
> +	/* The cell spufs coredump code reads the file descriptor tables */
>  	retval = unshare_files();
>  	if (retval)
>  		goto close_fail;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux