Re: [rfc][patch] mm: direct io less aggressive syncs and invalidates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:

> Improve this by doing range syncs. Also, memory no longer has to be 
> unmapped to catch the dirty bits for syncing, as dirty bits would remain 
> coherent due to dirty mmap accounting.

mmaped memory doesn't have have to by synchronized at all with read/write. 
It has to be only synchonized if msync or munmap is called --- that's what 
Posix says.

So direct i/o implementation that ignores mmap would be correct. Direct 
i/o implementation that is not synchronized w.r.t. nondirect i/o wouldn't.

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux