Re: [PATCH 01/29] iov_iter: Switch to using a table of operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> which looks to be around a 6% drop.

That's quite a lot.

> which looks to be around 2-3%, but we're also running at a much
> slower rate (830K vs ~2.3M).

That's still a lot.

Thanks for having a look!

David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux