Re: [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:47:15AM +1100, npiggin@xxxxxxx wrote:
> OK, I'm happier with this patchset now. Note that I've taken your patch
> and mangled it a bit at the end of the series.
> 
> This one survives and seems to run OK here, but I'm mainly doing dumb
> stress testing with a handful of filesystems, and data-io error injection
> testing. There are a lot of combinations of ways this function can operate
> and interact obviously, so it would be helpful to get more review.
> 
> Chris, would you possibly have time to run your btrfs tests that are
> sensitive to problems in this code? I could provide you a single patch
> rollup against mainline if it helps.

Nick, after applying the patchset:

  CC      mm/page-writeback.o
mm/page-writeback.c: In function write_cache_pages:
mm/page-writeback.c:871: warning: wrteback_index may be used uninitialized in this function

Looks harmless, but it probably should be cleaned up.
Compiler is 'gcc version 4.3.1 (Debian 4.3.1-9)'

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux