Re: [PATCH v9 8/9] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:29:31PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Wire up memfd_secret system call on architectures that define
> ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP, namely arm64, risc-v and x86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h        | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h      | 2 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h   | 1 +
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h        | 1 +
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 +
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
>  include/linux/syscalls.h               | 1 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h      | 6 +++++-
>  scripts/checksyscalls.sh               | 4 ++++
>  9 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> index 86a9d7b3eabe..949788f5ba40 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>  #define __ARM_NR_compat_set_tls		(__ARM_NR_COMPAT_BASE + 5)
>  #define __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END		(__ARM_NR_COMPAT_BASE + 0x800)
>  
> -#define __NR_compat_syscalls		442
> +#define __NR_compat_syscalls		443
>  #endif
>  
>  #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h
> index 6c1dcca067e0..5279481ec95b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h
> @@ -891,6 +891,8 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2)
>  __SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_process_madvise)
>  #define __NR_watch_mount 441
>  __SYSCALL(__NR_watch_mount, sys_watch_mount)
> +/* 442 is memfd_secret, it is not implemented for 32-bit */
> +__SYSCALL(442, sys_ni_syscall)

It now behaves correctly for compat but I don't think we need to
increment __NR_compat_syscalls. The compat syscall handler already calls
sys_ni_syscall() if out of range.

So the only arm64 change needed is defining __ARCH_WANT_MEMFD_SECRET
(well, we don't have a use for it yet ;)).

-- 
Catalin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux