Hi all, On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:20:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > on x86_64: > > as reported on 2020-11-12: > > when CONFIG_MEMCG is not set: > > ../mm/secretmem.c: In function ‘secretmem_memcg_charge’: > ../mm/secretmem.c:72:4: error: ‘struct page’ has no member named ‘memcg_data’ > p->memcg_data = page->memcg_data; > ^~ > ../mm/secretmem.c:72:23: error: ‘struct page’ has no member named ‘memcg_data’ > p->memcg_data = page->memcg_data; > ^~ > ../mm/secretmem.c: In function ‘secretmem_memcg_uncharge’: > ../mm/secretmem.c:86:4: error: ‘struct page’ has no member named ‘memcg_data’ > p->memcg_data = 0; > ^~ (As I said earlier today,) I will apply the following to linux-next today: From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:55:10 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] secretmem-add-memcg-accounting-fix2 Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/secretmem.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c index 5ed6b2070136..c7a37b2d01ed 100644 --- a/mm/secretmem.c +++ b/mm/secretmem.c @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ bool secretmem_active(void) static int secretmem_memcg_charge(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order) { +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG unsigned long nr_pages = (1 << order); int i, err; @@ -72,11 +73,13 @@ static int secretmem_memcg_charge(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order) p->memcg_data = page->memcg_data; } +#endif return 0; } static void secretmem_memcg_uncharge(struct page *page, int order) { +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG unsigned long nr_pages = (1 << order); int i; @@ -87,6 +90,7 @@ static void secretmem_memcg_uncharge(struct page *page, int order) } memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(page, PMD_PAGE_ORDER); +#endif } static int secretmem_pool_increase(struct secretmem_ctx *ctx, gfp_t gfp) -- 2.29.2 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpW2kERhzKJ9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature