Hi Thomas, On 03.11.2020 10:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > No reason having the same code in every architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This patch landed in linux-next 20201109 as commit 2a15ba82fa6c ("ARM: highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic"). However it causes a following warning on my test boards (Samsung Exynos SoC based): Run /sbin/init as init process INIT: version 2.88 booting ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 120 at mm/highmem.c:502 kunmap_local_indexed+0x194/0x1d0 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 120 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.0-rc2-00010-g2a15ba82fa6c #1924 Hardware name: Samsung Exynos (Flattened Device Tree) [<c0111514>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010ceb8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010ceb8>] (show_stack) from [<c0b1b408>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xd4) [<c0b1b408>] (dump_stack) from [<c0126988>] (__warn+0x98/0x104) [<c0126988>] (__warn) from [<c0126aa4>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0xb0/0xb8) [<c0126aa4>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c028e22c>] (kunmap_local_indexed+0x194/0x1d0) [<c028e22c>] (kunmap_local_indexed) from [<c02d37f4>] (remove_arg_zero+0xa0/0x158) [<c02d37f4>] (remove_arg_zero) from [<c034cfc8>] (load_script+0x250/0x318) [<c034cfc8>] (load_script) from [<c02d2f7c>] (bprm_execve+0x3d0/0x930) [<c02d2f7c>] (bprm_execve) from [<c02d3dc8>] (do_execveat_common+0x174/0x184) [<c02d3dc8>] (do_execveat_common) from [<c02d4cec>] (sys_execve+0x30/0x38) [<c02d4cec>] (sys_execve) from [<c0100060>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Exception stack(0xc4561fa8 to 0xc4561ff0) 1fa0: b6f2bab8 bef7dac4 bef7dac4 bef7d8fc 004b9b58 bef7dac8 1fc0: b6f2bab8 bef7dac4 bef7d8fc 0000000b 004b8000 004bac44 bef7da3c bef7d8dc 1fe0: 0000002f bef7d89c b6d6dc74 b6d6d65c irq event stamp: 1283 hardirqs last enabled at (1293): [<c019f564>] console_unlock+0x430/0x6b0 hardirqs last disabled at (1302): [<c019f55c>] console_unlock+0x428/0x6b0 softirqs last enabled at (1282): [<c0101768>] __do_softirq+0x528/0x674 softirqs last disabled at (1269): [<c012fed4>] irq_exit+0x1dc/0x1e8 ---[ end trace 6f32a2fb4294655f ]--- I can do more tests to help fixing this issue. Just let me know what to do. ... Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland