On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:05 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 23:45:30 -0500 Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 8:43 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:16:27 -0500 Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > This patch series is a follow up based on the suggestions and feedback by Linus: > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wizk=OxUyQPbO8MS41w2Pag1kniUV5WdD5qWL-gq1kjDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Al Viro has been playing in here as well - see the below, from > > > linux-next. > > > > > > I think I'll leave it to you folks to sort this out, please. > > > > Thank you Andrew for pointing that out! Sorry that I didn't notice Al > > Viro's nice clean ups. > > > > The changes are all orthogonal and apply cleanly except "epoll: pull > > fatal signal checks into ep_send_events()". The conflict is trivial > > and the following patch should cleanly apply to linux-next/master (I > > didn't move the initialization of `res = 0` after the new branch to > > keep it simple). > > > > FWIW, I also stress-tested the patch series applied on top of > > linux-next/master for a couple of hours. > > > > Could you please let me know whether I should send a V2 of the patch > > series for linux-next? Thanks! > > That worked, thanks. I'll include all this in the next drop for > linux-next. Awesome! Thanks very much, Andrew!
