Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 10:59:40 -0800
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guantao Liu <guantaol@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CACSApva7rcbvtSyV6XY0q3eFQqmPXV=0zY9X1FPKkUk-hSodpA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20180716

On Sat, 07 Nov 2020, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh wrote:

FWIW, I also stress-tested the patch series applied on top of
linux-next/master for a couple of hours.


Out of curiosity, what exactly did you use for testing?

Thanks,
Davidlohr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
  - From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh

References:
- [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
  - From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
  - From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
  - From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh

Prev by Date: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] fuse: Abort waiting for a response if the daemon receives a fatal signal
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux