On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Shirish Pargaonkar > As I look into this sndbuf and rcvbuf size setting ... what concerns > me is why nfs sets these sizes for snd and rcvbuf sizes still if they > don't need to be set? We (cifs) have larger write sizes (56K) than > nfs's default. See svc_set_sockbufsize in net/sunrpc/svcsock.c What is the valid range for the sndbuf and rcvbuf size so I can sanity check this if the user overrides it on mount? -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
