On 11/8/20 7:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 9:17 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Started from discussion [1], where was noted that currently a couple of
>> architectures support mremap() for vdso/sigpage, but not munmap().
>> If an application maps something on the ex-place of vdso/sigpage,
>> later after processing signal it will land there (good luck!)
>>
>> Patches set is based on linux-next (next-20201106) and it depends on
>> changes in x86/cleanups (those reclaim TIF_IA32/TIF_X32) and also
>> on my changes in akpm (fixing several mremap() issues).
>>
>> Logically, the patches set divides on:
>> - patch 1: cleanup for patches in x86/cleanups
>> - patches 2-11: cleanups for arch_setup_additional_pages()
>
> I like these cleanups, although I think you should stop using terms
> like "new-born". A task being exec'd is not newborn at all -- it's in
> the middle of a transformation.
Thank you for looking at them, Andy :-)
Yeah, somehow I thought about new-execed process as a new-born binary.
I'll try to improve changelogs in v2.
Thanks,
Dmitry
