Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Anand K Mistry <amistry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:05:46 -0700
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, asteinhauser@xxxxxxxxxx, joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201030172731.1.I7782b0cedb705384a634cfd8898eb7523562da99@changeid>

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:27:54 +1100 Anand K Mistry <amistry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect
> branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status.

Why is this considered useful?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation
  - From: Anand K. Mistry

References:
- [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation
  - From: Anand K Mistry

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/34] fs: idmapped mounts
Next by Date: Re: possible deadlock in do_fcntl
Previous by thread: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]