Hello! On Friday 30 October 2020 18:02:29 Konstantin Komarov wrote: > 27 files changed, 28364 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/ntfs3.rst > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/Kconfig > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/Makefile > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/attrlist.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/bitfunc.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/bitmap.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/debug.h > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/dir.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/file.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/fslog.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/index.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/inode.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/lznt.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/namei.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/ntfs.h > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/record.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/run.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/super.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/upcase.c > create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/xattr.c I would like to open discussion about two ntfs kernel drivers. Do we really need two drivers (one read only - current version and one read/write - this new version)? What other people think? I remember that Christoph (added to loop) had in past a good argument about old staging exfat driver (it had support also for fat32/vfat), that it would cause problems if two filesystem drivers would provide support for same filesystem.
