Re: [PATCH] inotify: Increase default inotify.max_user_watches limit to 1048576

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/27/20 12:00 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Mon 26-10-20 16:44:18, Waiman Long wrote:
The default value of inotify.max_user_watches sysctl parameter was set
to 8192 since the introduction of the inotify feature in 2005 by
commit 0eeca28300df ("[PATCH] inotify"). Today this value is just too
small for many modern usage. As a result, users have to explicitly set
it to a larger value to make it work.

After some searching around the web, these are the
inotify.max_user_watches values used by some projects:
  - vscode:  524288
  - dropbox support: 100000
  - users on stackexchange: 12228
  - lsyncd user: 2000000
  - code42 support: 1048576
  - monodevelop: 16384
  - tectonic: 524288
  - openshift origin: 65536

Each watch point adds an inotify_inode_mark structure to an inode to be
watched. Modeled after the epoll.max_user_watches behavior to adjust the
default value according to the amount of addressable memory available,
make inotify.max_user_watches behave in a similar way to make it use
no more than 1% of addressable memory within the range [8192, 1048576].

For 64-bit archs, inotify_inode_mark should have a size of 80 bytes. That
means a system with 8GB or more memory will have the maximum value of
1048576 for inotify.max_user_watches. This default should be big enough
for most of the use cases.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
So I agree that 8192 watches seem to be a bit low today but what you
propose seems to be way too much to me. OTOH I agree that having to tune
this manually kind of sucks so I'm for auto-tuning of the default. If the
computation takes into account the fact that a watch pins an inode as Amir
properly notes (that's the main reason why the number of watches is
limited), I think limiting to 1% of pinned memory should be bearable. The
amount of space pinned by an inode is impossible to estimate exactly
(differs for different filesystems) but about 1k for one inode is a sound
estimate IMO.

								Honza

I will certainly do that. Will send out a v2 soon.

Cheers,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux