Re: [PATCH] fuse: check whether fuse_request_alloc returns NULL in fuse_simple_request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



friendly ping...

On 2020/10/22 21:13, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
> 
> In fuse_simple_request func, we will call fuse_request_alloc func to alloc
> one request from fuse_req_cachep when args->force is true. However, the
> return value of fuse_request_alloc func is not checked whether it is NULL.
> If allocating request fails, access-NULL-pointer problem will occur.
> 
> Here, we check the return value of fuse_request_alloc func.
> 
> Fixes: 7213394c4e18 ("fuse: simplify request allocation")
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Haotian Li <lihaotian9@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> index 02b3c36b3676..f7dd33ae8e31 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> @@ -481,6 +481,8 @@ ssize_t fuse_simple_request(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args)
>  	if (args->force) {
>  		atomic_inc(&fc->num_waiting);
>  		req = fuse_request_alloc(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> +		if (!req)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> 
>  		if (!args->nocreds)
>  			fuse_force_creds(fc, req);
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux