Re: general protection fault in __se_sys_io_uring_register
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][Thread Next][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: syzbot <syzbot+4520eff3d84059553f13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: general protection fault in __se_sys_io_uring_register
From
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:02:04 -0600
In-reply-to
: <
0000000000000c3be205b1a4782f@google.com
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
#syz dup: general protection fault in __do_sys_io_uring_register -- Jens Axboe
References
:
general protection fault in __se_sys_io_uring_register
From:
syzbot
Prev by Date:
general protection fault in __se_sys_io_uring_register
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH 01/14] fs: Support THPs in vfs_dedupe_file_range
Previous by thread:
general protection fault in __se_sys_io_uring_register
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Ext4 Filesystem]
[Union Filesystem]
[Filesystem Testing]
[Ceph Users]
[Ecryptfs]
[AutoFS]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux Cachefs]
[Reiser Filesystem]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
[CEPH Development]
