Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] SELinux support for anonymous inodes and UFFD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] SELinux support for anonymous inodes and UFFD
From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 02:48:00 +1100 (AEDT)
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx>, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Colascione <dancol@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Cedeno <thomascedeno@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@xxxxxxxxxx>, Aaron Goidel <acgoide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Reber <areber@xxxxxxxxxx>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LSM List <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, SElinux list <selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Calin Juravle <calin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CA+EESO4eS4KsqgjmDWdwMozK36GbgTvJsKsC_5NO-pQA3huDWg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, Lokesh Gidra wrote:

>  Is there anything else that needs to be done before merging this
> patch series? I urge the reviewers to please take a look.
> 

It looks generally fine to me from a security POV, we really need some 
feedback from VFS folk.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v9 0/3] SELinux support for anonymous inodes and UFFD
  - From: Lokesh Gidra
- Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] SELinux support for anonymous inodes and UFFD
  - From: Lokesh Gidra

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Small step toward KSM for file back page.
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] core.fsyncObjectFiles: make the docs less flippant
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] SELinux support for anonymous inodes and UFFD
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2] fscrypt: avoid ambiguous terms for "no-key name"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]