Re: [PATCH V3] fuse: Remove __GFP_FS flag to avoid allocator recursing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-09-24 20:26, ppvk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2020-09-23 18:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:27:55AM +0530, Pradeep P V K wrote:
Changes since V2:
- updated memalloc_nofs_save() to allocation paths that potentially
  can cause deadlock.

That's the exact opposite of what I said to do.  Again, the *THREAD*
is the thing which must not block, not the *ALLOCATION*.  So you
set this flag *ON THE THREAD*, not *WHEN IT DOES AN ALLOCATION*.
If that's not clear, please ask again.

The fuse threads are created and started in external libfuse userspace
library functions but not in Kernel. The lowest entry point for these threads
to enter in kernel is fuse_dev_read()/fuse_dev_splice_read().

So, can we suppose to use memalloc_nofs_save() from
external userspace library functions ?

Even if we used, can you confirm, if the context of memalloc_nofs_save()
can be persist in kernel ?  (when the thread enters into kernel space).

Also, i didn't see memalloc_nofs_save() been used/called from any
external userspace library functions.


Thanks and Regards,
Pradeep

Friendly Reminder !!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux