On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:15 -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > James Morris wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, David P. Quigley wrote: > > > >> * New security flavor (auth_seclabel) to transport process label to > >> server. This is a derivative of auth_unix so it does not support > >> kerberos which has its own issues that need to be dealt with. > > > > This is a problem, as discussed last year: > > > > http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/labeled-nfs/2007-November/000110.html > > > > We can't require the use of a new auth flavor which is incompatible with > > auth_gss. > > auth_seclabel demonstrates the flavor independent changes required for > any RPC layer process label transport. A GSS solution is currently > under discussion. Right, but I'm not particularly interested in merging "demonstration" code that might end up requiring permanent support. I'd very much like to see all of this get further through the IETF process before we talk about merging into mainline. Cheers Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
